This is, how you say, a "cop out" post. I haven't blogged in a while (shame on me) because I've been busy enjoying life and it's little quirks.
Currently, my English Composition students are studying "film" and their assignment is to essentially write a rhetorical analysis / literary criticism of their favorite film. I like to provide students with imperfect, but strong examples of what I'm looking for. However, when an assignment is new, I find that I've got to come up with my own "imperfect, but strong" example of what I might be looking for. I like to ask students permission to use their work as examples (name redacted, of course), but you can't do that if you just created the assignment.
So, I took to writing my own college freshman analysis. Now, it's been a while since I've actually been a college freshman, but I think I see enough work to write something that might pass (or I'm a pedantic asshole... who knows... it's probably this option).
I decided to write about "Labyrinth" because I love the film. It's something my Aunt Tina passed down to me.... and something I plan to pass down to my nieces and nephews. Corrupt them young, I always say.
If you're wondering about the title, and you might be.... the opening sequence of the Labyrinth portion of the film shows Hoggle peeing in a pond. This was something I found HILARIOUS as a child... and also today because I am, in fact, an overgrown child. My Aunt and I used to play a story game that often started out with "One fine day, Hoggle was peeing in a pond..." and went off in all sorts of fun and inappropriate directions.
“Labyrinth”
The film “Labyrinth” was not a box
office hit. It did not gain popularity until it found its way into the homes of
potential viewers via VHS, DVD and now BluRay. The movie is widely regarded as
a “cult classic,” which warmed the hearts of viewers through its opposition and
derivation from mainstream cinema. While the film did not originally strike a
chord with its intended audience, it has fought against the odds to attain a
“cool” status. Today, the film is seen as revolutionary and is often ironically
enjoyed. Though, in regards to popularity and quality, “Labyrinth” rivals some
of today’s best films with its message of female empowerment, promotion of
fostering strong friendships, use of trademark Henson puppetry, and inclusion
of musical icon David Bowie.
The premise of the film is a simple
one. A teenage girl, fed up with the way the world treats her (as so many
teenagers are), wishes for the Goblin King to come and take her crying baby
brother away. Not knowing that the Goblin King is real, the girl winds up going
on a journey through the labyrinth to find and save her baby brother from
becoming a goblin (Rattray & Henson, 1986). It is hokey. Though, it is
meant to be. The film was aimed toward children. What wasn’t intended was the
message of female empowerment that the film conveys.
The teenage girl, Sara, starts out
as whiney. She is weak and absentminded. She believes the world is cruel and
that her step-mother is “an evil witch from some fairy story” (Rattray &
Henson, 1986). Though, as she gains determination while fighting to save her
little brother, her childish attitude falls away. At the end of the film, she
battles with the Goblin King and walks away the winner. She is stronger. The
film conveys the idea that the Goblin King has no power over the young girl
(Rattray & Henson, 1986). This was a newer approach used in the 80’s films.
So, as time progressed, female viewers grabbed on to this character and the
feats she managed to accomplish in the film.
The film also conveys a warm fuzzy
message about the enduring power of friendship. Sara enters the labyrinth alone.
But, as she gets closer and closer to the center of the maze, she starts to
pick up a colorful cast of friends. By the end of the film, they bonded through
their adventures. Emotionally, this concept of friendship tugs at the heart
strings of viewers. The resounding mantras of, we will be there whenever you call, whenever you need us and you’re not alone, even when you think you
are connect to the sentiments of viewers. The characters are entertaining,
grouchy, indignant and feisty. But, they are friends. They’re loving and
supportive. This is something that all viewers want, that they can relate to.
So, regardless of demographic, the film is able to bridge the gap between story
and audience (Rattray & Henson, 1986).
However, it is not only the message
and cast of characters that are compelling. The film itself relies on the
creativity and design work of Jim Henson. Over time, Henson’s work has become a
thing of legend. It’s also something that many people of many generations
associate with their childhood. The vibrantly colored and imaginative puppetry
that earned Henson his fame is ever present in this film. Henson, coupled with
the artwork of Brian Froud, created fairies, goblins, henchmen, giant wooly
beasts and even a tiny British snail. These iconic characters now adorn all
sorts of merchandise. They are interesting to look at and aesthetically
pleasing in a way that only Jim Henson was able to create. But, realistically,
Jim Henson’s creations bring back fond memories of childhood of a time when
things seemed simpler. This is the feeling that many viewers associate with “Labyrinth”.
The film work and technology is limited by what was available in the
mid-eighties, but still holds that signature Henson charm.
All of this, coupled with the choice
of leading man, makes for a well-defined film. This, of course, refers to the
iconic David Bowie. Bowie was a trendsetter. He was outspoken, bold, and
talented. He was revered as the epitome of cool. Bowie brought an essence of
80’s glam to a children’s film. The world that knew him as this edgy musical
pariah, but Bowie’s work in front of the camera only added to his repertoire.
He went on to star in several films.
So, while “Labyrinth” was not
initially the success that studios had anticipated, it is still a quality film.
The way it has gained popularity against all odds is telling. The initial
failings of “Labyrinth” were more due to an inability or confusion about how to
market the film and who to sell it to. Does it appeal to children? Of course.
Could it have been marketed to an older audience? Yes. It was a film that
didn’t quite fit into the confines of traditional cinema. But, with an aire of coolness
and a strong concept, the film has wormed its way into the hearts of viewers of
all ages. The story is strong. The ideas are compelling. The puppetry is
iconic. And, of course, David Bowie is David Bowie.
References
Rattray, E. (Producer)
& Hensen, J. (Director). (1986) Labyrinth
[Motion Picture]. United States
of
America: TriStar Pictures